The 1990s: Double Restart

German reunification and a change in the institute's management shape the 1990s – Fraunhofer IPK reinvents itself twice.

1990: Years of upheaval in the wake of reunification

© Fraunhofer IPK
The Fraunhofer IPK branch office on Kurstrasse in Berlin-Mitte
© Fraunhofer IPK
A resounding success five years after its founding: In 1994, on the anniversary of the CIM Technology Transfer Center, the Federal Minister of Research and Technology Dr. Paul Krüger visited the PTZ.

Contribution to the development of eastern Germany

The history of Fraunhofer IPK in the 1990s cannot be told without considering the general upheaval that followed the fall of the Berlin Wall and German reunification. These events set in motion processes that would have a significant impact on the work at the institute. On the one hand, the institute was heavily involved in the development of western structures and economics in East Germany after 1990. On the other hand, the general recession in West Germany and the discontinuation of Berlin subsidy led to a structural shift in the institute’s client base, which would have a direct impact on its research.

There was much work to be done in developing both industry and research after reunification, and Fraunhofer IPK was active in both areas. From 1992 to 1996, the institute maintained a branch office in Berlin Mitte, where scientists and engineers from the former Academy of Sciences of the GDR were able to gain experience in project acquisition and in collaborating with industry partners. Parts of the branch office staff were transferred to Fraunhofer IPK after 1996.

At the same time, various initiatives supported East German manufacturing companies in their transition to a market economy. As early as 1990, four new locations in East Germany were added to the CIM Technology Transfer Centers. The CIM-TT Center Berlin, which had been based at the PTZ since 1988, took on the coordination and supported the establishment of the locations in Chemnitz, Dresden, Magdeburg, and Wismar. It also initiated the establishment of an »Investment Market Berlin-Brandenburg« under the patronage of Federal Minister of Economics Jürgen W. Möllemann. The Investment Market was intended to provide investors with information about the Berlin-Brandenburg districts, companies slated for privatization, and the PTZ’s technology-oriented management expertise. At the same time, a Center for Workshop-Oriented Programming Methods, known within Fraunhofer IPK as the »WOP Center«, worked to simplify the programming of shop-floor equipment using graphical-interactive input methods. After 1990, the center’s services were primarily utilized by interested parties from the new federal states.

Economic structural change is arriving at Fraunhofer IPK

Despite all efforts to boost the East German economy, contract research at the institute initially suffered a sharp decline. The reasons are complex. The West Berlin economy had been subsidized for years, primarily to keep the manufacturing sector in the city despite unfavorable location conditions and a lack of access to the surrounding area. This so-called Berlin subsidy was rapidly phased out after 1990, making the location unattractive for many companies. A large number migrated to West Germany, and previously close ties with Fraunhofer IPK often came to a standstill. At the same time, investment in research and development declined amid the general recession following German reunification.

The effects can be observed at the institute as if through a magnifying glass: Between 1992 and 1995, the number of employees at Fraunhofer IPK dropped sharply, while the budget simultaneously shrank drastically. A look at the client industries shows that the institute shifted its focus to stabilize its operations: While client companies before 1990 came primarily from the fields of electrical and communications engineering as well as mechanical engineering, the automotive industry, for example, now gained influence. Sectors that had previously generated only a small volume of contracts were now officially included in the statistics – such as optics or aerospace. From the mid-1990s onward, the institute’s financial situation stabilized on this basis, and the shift in sectoral focus sparked an exciting expansion of research topics throughout the decade.

1992: Machine vision or vision of the future?

© Fraunhofer IPK
Dr. Bertram Nickolay, 1993
© Fraunhofer IPK
As early as 1988, Fraunhofer IPK was working on image analysis for quality assurance purposes.
© Fraunhofer IPK
Camera setup for surface analysis, 1996

Surface-level excellence

As early as the 1970s, researchers at IWF of TU Berlin had been experimenting with object recognition using sensors such as cameras, even before computers were capable of storing and analyzing the collected data. The reason for a research institute with a focus on production science to address this topic is clear: With increasing automation, for example in the automotive industry, industrial robots and other systems had to independently locate, identify, and move parts. Image analysis was also initially viewed as a subfield of sensor technology in projects at Fraunhofer IPK and used for simple handling processes. Examples included measuring the height and determining the position of stacked workpieces using two cameras mounted on an industrial robot, or the so-called »reach into the box« scenario, where objects are, in extreme cases, randomly piled on top of each other and overlap in camera images.

With better cameras and more powerful computers, the range of applications for this technology expanded rapidly in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Under the leadership of Dr. Bertram Nickolay, Fraunhofer IPK established a department for pattern recognition that focused on automated image analysis, including for application in quality assurance. In 1992, Dr. Nickolay was awarded the Joseph von Fraunhofer Prize for his doctorate on a »trainable image analysis system to evaluate material surfaces and detect surface defects« that was trained using supervised machine learning – the second such prize for Fraunhofer IPK.

Lights, camera, action!

It did not take long for practical applications of these advanced methods to emerge: From inspecting sewer systems with robots to quality-checking parts from casting processes and supporting diagnostics at the Deutsches Herzzentrum, Dr. Nickolay’s team was in high demand. And they actively sought out contacts beyond production. For the researchers, there was no doubt that their industrial image processing systems had the potential to be transferred from production to other fields. After all, they were capable of recognizing and analyzing virtually any pattern.

© Fraunhofer IPK
By 1994, license plate recognition at entrance gates was already functioning very reliably: The software developed in a project for parking garages could evaluate license plates within one to two seconds.
© Fraunhofer IPK
Authentic or fake? To verify the authenticity of signatures on passports, checks and contract documents, banks and government agencies relied on image analysis systems from Fraunhofer IPK.

Pattern recognition, in the form of optical character recognition (OCR), thus increasingly found its way into everyday applications. It took just one to two seconds for a Fraunhofer IPK system to automatically recognize car license plates in parking garages. Projects on forgery protection, signature verification, and fingerprint identification were also highly successful: As a strategic partner to banks and government agencies such as the Bundeskriminalamt, the institute was involved in important developments in security technology for many years. The fact that Dr. Nickolay and his department had established a new focus for the institute’s research would continue to have an impact well into the 2010s – with projects such as the reconstruction of cultural artifacts that found users worldwide.

1992 Simulation at all levels of production

Anticipating the real-world process virtually

Modeling and simulation are indispensable tools in today’s manufacturing. From validating machining operations and setting up process chains to mapping complex organizational structures, they support processes at every level of the industrial hierarchy. The properties and behavior of systems are thus captured and optimized without the need for time-consuming real-world testing, and complex relationships are visualized in a comprehensible manner.

Against this backdrop, it is hardly surprising that, in an institute with a strong digital focus, the broad field of »simulation« became a defining area of activity at an early stage. Since the 1980s, the institute’s annual reports have included descriptions of research on simulation topics across all its departments. One example among the multitude of activities related to the simulation of manufacturing processes: In the early 1990s, the institute was able to virtually model the entire process of automated car body painting and implement corresponding solutions in the automotive industry. The technologies developed became part of the »RobCAD Painting Module« distributed by the Israeli company Tecnomatix, and from there were later incorporated into Product Lifecycle Management software made by Siemens. 

© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
Control simulator, 1986: This device allowed control software developed for Traub to be tested as if it were running on the actual machine.
© Fraunhofer IPK
Dr. Xiaoyi Liu’s doctoral thesis on the simulation of pneumatic and electrostatic painting processes was awarded AEG’s Carl Ramsauer Prize in 1992.
© Fraunhofer IPK
The LAROS coating simulation helped determine the appropriate process strategy for optimal paint distribution.

Various areas of expertise at the institute played a role in this field, such as construction technology and robotics. A contribution from the latter area was awarded a prize: Dr. Xiaoyi Liu was awarded AEG’s Carl Ramsauer Prize in 1992 for his dissertation on pneumatic and electrostatic painting processes. The reason for the award: Simulation integrates domain knowledge from various fields, bringing together physical, chemical, or mechanical aspects with information technology tools. Dr. Xiaoyi Liu succeeded groundbreakingly in harmonizing the fields of fluid mechanics, electric field theory, computer science, and practical industrial application. His method was applied industrially during the offline programming phase of painting robots to achieve a more uniform paint layer, increase painting efficiency, and prevent painting defects.

© Fraunhofer IPK
The MOSYS simulation system was developed in the 1980s for planning a state-of-the-art flexible NC production hall at MBB in Donauwörth.
© Fraunhofer IPK
MO²GO models transfer the structures, services, processes and data of a company into an integrated enterprise model and provide the data available in a targeted manner. With few notation elements, MO²GO makes the model representation easy to understand.
© Fraunhofer IPK
Training at the Demonstration Center for Simulation in Production and Logistics, 1995. A company model in MO²GO can be seen on the screen on the wall.

Modeling and simulation of factory processes

 

Operating at a higher level was the »Demonstration Center for Simulation in Production and Logistics«, which was officially inaugurated in September 1994. In the 1980s, Fraunhofer IPK had developed the MOSYS simulation system for planning complex manufacturing systems on the scale of entire factory halls. As part of CIM, the idea emerged to model not only the flow of materials within the factory layout but also the surrounding processes and their interdependencies – from order receipt through material logistics and manufacturing to the finished part, including the corresponding subdivisions and functional groups within a company. Systems commercially available at the time were not capable of this, because they were unable to map the necessary process integration. When, in 1986, processes within the company were to be modeled as part of a comprehensive study on the state of CIM technology for the automotive manufacturer VW, the foundations for Integrated Enterprise Modeling (IUM) and the MO²GO modeling tool were laid. In the years that followed, Fraunhofer IPK used this base to support numerous companies in mapping their business processes and optimizing them in a targeted manner.

 

Starting in 1994, the Demonstration Center set itself the task of making simulation solutions and technologies accessible to a broader user base. To this end, it not only offered training on various common simulation systems but also conducted simulation games in which companies were enabled, through the use of simulation techniques, to identify and remedy weaknesses in their processes. The interactive simulation game LIFE!, in which participants had to organize drill production according to different process logics, formed the basis for the serious games that are still being adapted at Fraunhofer IPK to ever-changing macroeconomic conditions – most recently to the requirements of the circular economy, for the implementation of digital product passports or for the development and training of resilient business processes.

1992: Interface to industry

© Fraunhofer IPK
Starting already in 1989, industrial robots from various manufacturers worked together in this flexible assembly cell. For widespread implementation of such systems in industry, the simulation of their workflows also had to function reliably.
© Fraunhofer IPK
In RRS I, the goal was still to couple the heterogeneous control and simulation systems for industrial robots, …
© Fraunhofer IPK
… while RRS II already integrated a nearly complete virtual model of the robot control systems into the simulation.

Between robot boom and reality

Working with individual companies to jointly develop, test in practice, and introduce innovative technologies has always been a central part of Fraunhofer IPK's work. In the 1990s, the institute’s reputation in the region, throughout Germany (including the new federal states) and on the international level led it to take on an active role in coordinating large project consortia. The »Realistic Robot Simulation (RRS)« project is a great example of this development.

Planning on a computer what must function with millimeter precision and on a massive scale in real automotive production is only possible with accurate digital models of industrial robots and their control systems. Simulation software available in the early 1990s was still insufficient for this task, as the programs had no access to the control systems’ internal algorithms and thus the manufacturers’ know-how. As a result, motion paths in the simulation often did not match the movements calculated by the control system, and cycle times deviated by up to 30 percent from what was planned. A common standard was needed. This sparked the idea to develop the RRS interface.

A standard to this day

Fraunhofer IPK was the perfect choice to coordinate the development project initiated by nine major automotive manufacturers (Audi, BMW, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Opel, Peugeot, Citroën, Renault, and VW). Its teams in Berlin had already maintained close ties with robot and control systems manufacturers such as KUKA, Reis Robotics, and Siemens for many years. In 1994, the RRS I consortium released the first version of the new interface, which already allowed six different robot control systems to be linked with four different simulation programs, significantly reducing deviations of axis target values and cycle times. At the same time, this made systems from different manufacturers compatible without forcing manufacturers to disclose their exact designs to competitors. By 1996, RRS I had already become an industry standard. 

Because the actual motion phases of industrial robots accounted for only about 40 percent of cycle times, internal processes within the control such as interrupts, logic and on/off behavior were also responsible for deviations. To simulate these processes, RRS II was now intended to include an almost complete representation of the control systems within the simulation. Researchers at Fraunhofer IPK had already demonstrated that this was possible in the ROTEX project for space applications. For the development of the Virtual Robot Controller Interface (VRC), the consortium was expanded to include partners from robot manufacturing, software and control systems development. More than 35 companies were involved in total, working together for many years to further develop the interface.

The project continues to have a lasting impact: RRS I is still in effect in version 1.3.

© Fraunhofer IPK
Coordinated by Fraunhofer IPK, all relevant stakeholders were brought on board: from automotive and robot manufacturers to control system and software developers.

1992: Information Center Benchmarking

© Fraunhofer IPK
Workshop at the Information Center Benchmarking in the 1990s
© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
»3B« (Bob, Benchmarking, Bow Tie): Dr. Robert Camp at IZB on the occasion of the 10-year anniversary of the GBN in 2004

A good comparison is half the planning

Comparisons are a constant feature of scientific work. Anyone developing a new technology first looks at the current state of research. Anyone tasked with changing processes or implementing new solutions in industry examines how others do it. This is also how the Planning Technology department at Fraunhofer IPK operated: Since the department’s early days, comparable companies have served as important points of reference in the planning of manufacturing facilities. In the study for VW on the state of CIM in 1986, which was already mentioned in the context of simulation, comparison was taken to the max: A team of about 30 experts from Fraunhofer IPK and VW spent more than a year visiting all major automotive companies around the world and examining their production methods. 

One challenge in this context is that not all factory planners and organizers in companies are willing to share the data needed for systematic comparisons. The Information Center Benchmarking (IZB), which was launched in 1994 as the first institution of its kind in Germany under the direction of Gunnar Siebert and Stefan Kempf, sought to address this need with a new offering: The process-oriented benchmarking developed by the founders was intended to generate and share best-practice knowledge.In the same year, the Global Benchmarking Network (GBN) was founded – initially as a partnership between IZB and the benchmarking centers in the U.S. and Sweden. 

From the BenchmarkIndex to knowledge management

Benchmarking as a management method is searching for solutions based on the industry’s best methods and procedures – the »best practices«. Its scope ranges from optimizing business processes to comprehensive support for a company’s strategic direction. The newly established IZB quickly gained such a strong reputation within the scientific community that, as early as its second year of existence, it was able to welcome a prominent figure in the field to Fraunhofer IPK: As part of a benchmarking conference at the institute, benchmarking pioneer Dr. Robert Camp led a workshop. A milestone for the IZB was the development of the BenchmarkIndex by Dr. Holger Kohl as part of the European pilot project REACTE from 1999 to 2001, a database comparison featuring over 100,000 continuously updated data records. This comparison enables companies to compare their own key performance indicators at national and international levels with those of other firms. Both process benchmarking and the BenchmarkIndex quickly became standard tools for comparing best practices, not only in Germany. 

With the systematization of benchmarking activities, the planning department headed by Kai Mertins, who had meanwhile become Professor, began to expand its portfolio from the planning of production facilities into the field of management methods. This was followed as early as 1997 by the founding of the Competence Center for Knowledge Management (CCWM). Knowledge is one of the most valuable intangible resources of a company, the importance of which often becomes apparent only when it is lost: When long-serving employees retire, companies lose a rich treasure trove of experiential knowledge. Systematizing and preserving this intellectual capital is the mission of the CCWM, which is nowadays headed by Dr. Markus Will.

 

An important tool of the CCWM is knowledge balance sheet reporting. Developed through 2004 as part of the pilot project »Knowledge Balance Sheet – Made in Germany« with a particular focus on the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises, it serves to align knowledge management (KM) with corporate and business strategy and to continuously assess the effectiveness and goal achievement of KM measures. The software application »Knowledge Balance Sheet Toolbox« supports this process. 

© Fraunhofer IPK / Gerold Baumhauer
Dr. Markus Will leading a knowledge balance sheet reporting workshop at the institute, 2010

1995: Full speed ahead!

© Fraunhofer IPK
Federal Minister of Transport Matthias Wissmann and Institute Director Professor Spur in conversation at the International Congress Center (ICC) Berlin during the 1995 Production Technology Colloquium
© Stadtarchiv Hennigsdorf
Center for Transportation Technology (TZV) in Hennigsdorf near Berlin

Transportation technology for the region

The railway reform, the modernization of infrastructure in the new federal states, digitalization, and debates about the environmental impact of passenger transport – transportation technology was a key focus of the 1990s, including at Fraunhofer IPK. At the 1995 Production Technology Colloquium on the topic of »Management and Production for Environment and Transportation« held at the International Congress Center (ICC) Berlin, Federal Minister of Transportation Matthias Wissmann, the institute, and the participating industry partners set the goal of connecting all modes of transportation into an integrated system. In the field of telematics, for example for traffic planning and monitoring, the Ministry of Transport projected investments of 80 billion DM by 2010. ADTranz (ABB Daimler Benz Transportation, at that time the world’s largest rail vehicle manufacturer) also recognized the significance of this development and proposed Hennigsdorf, north of Berlin, as the location for its implementation. At the new Center for Transportation Technology (TZV), companies and research institutions were to jointly develop innovative solutions, which would also strengthen regional businesses in the long term. Together with 28 other service providers, the Transportation Technology Group at Fraunhofer IPK moved into the TZV in 1996.

With the goal of improving cooperation among the many supplier companies and thereby strengthening their market position, the researchers began to build networking databases. By the end of the 1990s, the regional ProNetz network included nearly 850 companies, which could be grouped as needed into consortia or interest groups such as toolmaking or measurement and testing technology. Above all, however, the network provided companies with information on potential project opportunities at the regional and European levels. In the TransTech project, Fraunhofer IPK coordinated EU-wide supplier relationships and research collaborations to help participating companies move beyond simply manufacturing individual parts and become system suppliers. In addition to technological innovations, e-learning solutions were used to support the training of skilled workers in the region’s SMEs.

Going down the drain?

Researchers from Fraunhofer IPK also participated in numerous innovative projects in transportation technology – although not every one was crowned with long-term success. When the collaboration with CargoLifter began in 1999, the airship startup had just celebrated the groundbreaking ceremony for its shipyard in Brandenburg. One of the ways Fraunhofer IPK supported CargoLifter was by helping it find suppliers and representing the company at an aviation trade show in Moscow. In 2002, CargoLifter filed for bankruptcy and since 2004, the shipyard, the world's largest self-supporting hall, has housed an amusement park.

Whether in airships, airplanes or trains, washrooms with toilets are needed in many modes of transportation. As part of the »Lavatory Design Project«, Fraunhofer IPK coordinated with numerous companies from Berlin and Brandenburg to develop the vehicle toilet of the future. At ILA 2000, the futuristic-looking unit, featuring a design by the Potsdam University of Applied Sciences, was presented to Federal Minister of Economics Werner Müller and Governing Mayor Diepgen.

© Fraunhofer IPK
The futuristic restroom, developed as part of the »Lavatory Design Project« coordinated by Fraunhofer IPK
© Fraunhofer IPK
GPS devices monitor the traffic situation on the ground …
© Fraunhofer IPK
… and helicopters assess vehicle densities from the air.
© Fraunhofer IPK
The collected data is consolidated and analyzed at the traffic control center at PTZ Berlin.

Athens, Hanover, Hennigsdorf!

With the advent of telematics, real-time traffic planning also took center stage. During trials of Floating Car Data (FCD) technology, test fleets used their GPS devices to transmit real-time traffic conditions from the Berlin road sections they were traveling on to the traffic control center at Fraunhofer IPK. There, the overall traffic situation could be calculated from the individual reports. Using image processing tools from the German Aerospace Center (DLR), researchers were also able, for the first time, to derive vehicle densities and traffic data from aerial photographs taken by a helicopter. FCD technology was quickly deployed at major international events: It supported the traffic control centers in Athens during the 2004 Olympic Games and in the Hanover area during the 2006 FIFA World Cup.

1996: Active Worldwide

© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
The 40th CIRP General Assembly in Berlin in 1990, held at the Congress Hall, in the atrium of the TU Berlin, and at the Production Technology Center

On the international stage

The mission of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft is to support the German economy – and this mission sometimes takes the Fraunhofer institutes far beyond Germany’s borders, to every corner of the globe. The reasons for this can by manifold: Sometimes the goal is to pave the way for German industries to establish a presence abroad; other times, it is to support German companies operating overseas. Learning from international partners or jointly addressing global challenges can also serve as a starting point.

Aside from that, Fraunhofer is part of the scientific community, which is interconnected worldwide. For example, the International Academy for Production Engineering (CIRP), the most prestigious association of manufacturing researchers, currently has members from 41 countries. Its annual general assembly met in Berlin for the only time to date in 1990, specifically at the PTZ. This took place in the very year of German reunification and on the occasion of the 40th edition of the event – truly special circumstances for the conference.

© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
40th CIRP General Assembly in Berlin 1990 at the Congress Hall...
© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
...in the atrium of the TU Berlin,...
© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
...and at the Production Technology Center

Five years later, in November 1995, the Computer and Automated Systems Association of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (CASA/SME) decorated the PTZ with its LEAD Award. The award for »Leadership and Excellence in the Application and Development of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing« honored the unique combination of industry-oriented research and development, basic research, and teaching at the IWF and Fraunhofer IPK.

© Fraunhofer IPK / Larissa Klassen
The LEAD Award of the Computer and Automated Systems Association of the Society of Manufacturing
© Fraunhofer IPK
The Fraunhofer Representative Office (FRO) was situated at the German Center in Jakarta.

From Berlin to Jakarta

Fraunhofer IPK’s first comprehensive international initiative, dating back to the 1980s, was a collaboration with Indonesia. Initially, the institute supported on-site research and development projects; later, through an annual »Indonesia Day« held as part of Berlin’s Asia-Pacific Weeks, it promoted greater engagement by German companies in Indonesia, the most populous country in the Asia-Pacific region. In the 1990s, it played a key role in establishing a national research institute for production technology, the Mesin Perkakas Produksi Automatisasi (MEPPO) in Bandung.

To expand these activities, Fraunhofer IPK established a project office in Jakarta in the early 1990s. Through this branch office, the institute was involved in the mid-1990s in a major project that aimed at manufacturing a »national car« for Indonesia: Beginning in 1996, a team from Prof. Kai Mertins’ Production Planning department supported the planning of the TIMOR car factory in Jakarta. In 1999, the project office was converted into the Fraunhofer Representative Office (FRO) Indonesia; the 2008 economic crisis brought an end to Fraunhofer IPK’s strategic engagement in Indonesia. 

On technology parks and innovation systems

The founding of MEPPO opened up a new field of activity for Fraunhofer IPK that remains a key pillar of the institute to this day: the design of national innovation systems. The German federal government had provided financial support for the institute’s founding and subsequently sought to assess the state of local industrial development and determine how to support its further growth in the interest of German companies on a region-by-region basis. This led to a commission to develop a research plan for Indonesia.

To address this task, the institute developed a methodology that was later applied in various countries, such as Vietnam and Egypt. These activities reached their peak with the establishment of a comprehensive research landscape in Brazil beginning in the 2010s. However, smaller-scale innovation landscapes were also developed, such as technology parks in Dubai and Sharjah. 

© Fraunhofer IPK
Starting in 2008, Fraunhofer IPK supported the Dubai Institute of Technology (DIT) in designing a technology park. DIT Administrative Director Hamad Al-Hashimi and Prof. Kai Mertins at the contract signing ceremony

1997: New Institute Director

© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
Ceremonial handover of office to Prof. Eckart Uhlmann on September 1, 1997
© Fraunhofer IPK / Bernd Bresien
© Fraunhofer IPK / Eckart Uhlmann
Even before taking office, Professor Uhlmann had developed his vision of the end-to-end virtualization of manufacturing companies, which he intended Fraunhofer IPK to implement: Using digital tools, all entities and processes of a company are modeled and simulated. This results in a complete virtual representation (today we would call it a »digital twin«) of the company. With the help of this twin, processes in the real company can be planned, analyzed, controlled, and optimized.

A change of generations

The year 1997 marked a turning point in the history of Fraunhofer IPK: On September 1, Professor Eckart Uhlmann succeeded Professor Günter Spur as institute director. At the same time, he became head of the Machine Tools and Manufacturing Technology department at IWF of the TU Berlin. Professor Uhlmann had studied under and earned his doctorate from Professor Spur before gaining experience in industry as an authorized signatory responsible for research and development, applied technology, and patent matters.

The change in leadership heralded a fundamental realignment of the institute. This was urgently needed at the time. By the late 1990s, both the organization and research areas of Fraunhofer IPK, as well as its associated equipment, had become outdated. Although the focus on research activities in the fields of control, robotics, design, and planning technology had been extremely successful during the institute’s first ten years, by 1997 it no longer aligned with the current needs of industry and was in increasingly less demand. As a result, Fraunhofer IPK had not recovered from the economic crisis following 1990, and the institute’s financial situation remained strained.

New areas of expertise, strengthening existing fields of work

Professor Uhlmann’s appointment was preceded by intensive negotiations regarding the conditions necessary to restore the institute to its former leading position in the research landscape. The designated institute director had submitted a comprehensive strategic concept to the Fraunhofer-Gesellschafts’ executive board and to the Berlin Senate, outlining how new fields of work with high economic relevance could be developed by leveraging the institute’s existing expertise and building new capabilities. Four areas of work with a highly interdisciplinary, cross-cutting nature spanning all of the institute’s areas of expertise formed the core of the proposed strategic realignment. Within these areas – the virtualization of product and process development across the entire life cycle, production in globalized companies, medical and biotechnology, and transportation engineering – the greatest potential was identified for successfully guiding Fraunhofer IPK into the future. These can be broken down into proposals to realign the fields of product development and factory planning – including production management, planning, and control – to expand the field of transportation engineering, and to establish a new field of medical technology.

The plans were ultimately approved: The Berlin Senate and the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft allocated extensive special funds for modernizing the institute. Peter Radunski, the Senator for Science, Research, and Culture, and the Fraunhofer Executive Board made a total of 21 million DM available for equipment investments, the further development and strengthening of existing research areas, and the funding of new research fields.

Vision: End-to-end digital process chains

With this financial base, the institute’s restructuring began in 1998. Integration as a unique selling point – that was the vision being pursued. »Supporting companies from the product idea through product development to product manufacturing using innovative methods and processes, and designing the necessary industrial factory environment – this is Fraunhofer IPK’s declared goal«, as the institute’s mission was described in the 1999 annual report.

What was already underlying this vision at the time was nothing less than the ideal of »digitally integrated production«, which the institute pursues today. When the institute’s leadership changed in 1997, Fraunhofer IPK’s areas of activity were still largely separate from one another. The new research approach aimed to create the data and IT connections necessary for industry – from product development through factory and manufacturing organization to product manufacturing itself – and to incorporate these into Fraunhofer IPK’s research offerings. In addition, efforts were made to transfer production-related expertise to fields such as transportation and medicine.

The consistent implementation of this strategy and its reflection in a realignment of the institute’s organizational structure formed the basis upon which Fraunhofer IPK developed into one of the leading Fraunhofer Institutes in the years that followed. 

The triad of manufacturing technologies, machine tools, and tools

To create the organizational foundation for the reorientation of research, the departments and research groups at Fraunhofer IPK were consolidated into six divisions that covered the entire process chain of industrial manufacturing operations and were designed to interact more closely. This also led to the creation of a division dedicated to the development, application, and adaptation of production systems and manufacturing technologies for the first time in the institute’s history. Initially focused on tool and mold making, this division quickly evolved into the »Product Manufacturing« division, which has since been developing new machining strategies and technologies as well as the corresponding tooling and machine technology, optimizing existing processes and equipment or adapting them to new conditions – such as the machining of novel high-performance materials, and implementing future-oriented tooling concepts. This work applies to both macro-manufacturing and micro-production technology, the latter of which would soon become a flagship area of the institute.

© Fraunhofer IPK
Microtools were patented at IWF and subsequently applied at Fraunhofer IPK.
© Fraunhofer IPK
All-ceramic milling tool from the Production Systems division

1998: The virtual product

»The Virtual Product:« After Professor Spur and Professor Krause had already published a landmark work in 1984 titled »CAD Technology,« the successful sequel came out in 1997 and quickly became a standard reference work.

Product development for the next millennium

The situation on the CAx market in the early 1990s was clear: Although research projects like APS and programs developed in Berlin – such as COMVAR and COMPAC – had been major driving forces in both 2D and 3D modeling during the 1970s and 1980s, the market was dominated primarily by the better-resourced U.S. software manufacturers and their systems. »You would have to search with a magnifying glass to find German CAD providers,« wrote for example Computerwoche in 1994  in an article about the joint research project »CAD Reference Model« led by Fraunhofer IPK along with twelve industry partners and universities. Future-oriented, flexible, and computer-aided product development, human-centered design of work and technology, bringing high-quality products to market faster and more cost-effectively, product data management (PDM) – these were the buzzwords.

 

The researchers’ vision: systems for »The Virtual Product.« 2D editing becomes 3D processing, geometric models turn into virtual product models, which should now support all tasks along the process chains. The term »virtual« was not only meant to relate to digitalization: For Professor Frank-Lothar Krause, it also referred to companies networked via the Internet and distributed globally. Furthermore, virtual products should be created using new multimedia technologies such as VR and AR. On the initiative of Professor Krause, who has headed the institute's Design Technology department since its inception, a consortium of more than 50 partners led by Fraunhofer IPK, Volkswagen, and Siemens Business Services applied for the BMBF’s flagship project competition – and won: With 25 million euros in federal funding and an additional 25 million euros from industry partners, the participating software companies, research institutes, and end users would carry out projects on topics ranging from infrastructure to tools for virtual manufacturability testing to market preparation as part of the »Innovative Technologies and Systems for Integrated Virtual Product Development« (iViP) program until 2002.

The digital master

The goal of the iViP project was to create a comprehensive IT system environment for product development. Central to this was the concept of the open Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA): Instead of proprietary data formats and software that did not allow for integration, the iViP object interface and integration platform would enable data exchange between all tools used in product development. In the future, developers would organize their programs like building blocks within the central iViP client – including both locally installed iViP-compliant tools and external software that was not yet fully integrated, or even software-on-demand services that could be loaded from within their intranet or via the Internet as needed. Underpinning this, for the first time, was the »digital master« as the »single source of truth,« which made it possible to achieve digital continuity on a scale previously unattainable. The »Virtual Product Creation 2002« conference took stock of iViP upon its conclusion: A total of 45 prototypes were developed, of which approximately 30 became market-ready IT systems or could be integrated into other systems (for example, the PDM/PLM software axalant 2000 or SAP Automotive). SMEs, in particular, were to gain access to previously unaffordable high-tech software through the new iViP architecture and improve cooperation with clients and suppliers.

© Fraunhofer IPK
At the »Innovation Forum on Virtual Product Development« in 2000, over 250 guests, ranging from end users to system developers, exchanged ideas on the future of product development.
© Fraunhofer IPK
Closing conference »Virtual Product Creation 2002«

However, not all companies were ready to implement an open architecture in practice at the time and instead preferred to expand their own ecosystems – an incentive for institutions such as the Fraunhofer IPK to continue working on extensive industrial collaborations and exchange formats in the future. Also involved in the project was the ProSTEP association, which had been advocating for cross-industry data formats since 1993. Upon the completion of iViP, some partners decided to continue their joint work there. The resulting association, now called »prostep ivip,« has nearly 180 members from industry and research and regularly organizes international conferences, workshops, and other events related to industrial product development.

1999: Teleservice and the flagship project »e-Industrial Services«

© Fraunhofer IPK
Visionary in the early 1990s: The machine condition is monitored remotely via the Internet.

»Hi machine, how are you today?«

When, in the context of CIM, there was talk of »networking« components of a manufacturing control system, the focus was still on local networking. Although the internet had already been established by the late 1980s, access was still limited to universities. It wasn’t until 1990 that the U.S. National Science Foundation decided to open the network for commercial use – making it available for the work of Fraunhofer IPK as well. 

From Fraunhofer IPK’s perspective, the new ability to look from the outside into the inner workings of machine control systems was particularly interesting for machine monitoring and maintenance. Under the banner of » teleservice,« the Control Engineering department led by Eckhard Hohwieler therefore began integrating machine control systems into networks as soon as the World Wide Web emerged. The goal was to retrieve data from the control system and process it at any location – with the aim of enabling machine manufacturers to perform remote maintenance on the systems they sold. In the years that followed, the institute took on a pioneering role in this field.

Value-added services made by Fraunhofer

By the end of the 1990s, a platform had been developed that could capture any type of machine data. This not only enabled remote visualization of machine status but also supported service processes. To this end, the platform additionally captured user and contract data, which could be used as the basis for implementing after-sales services. Furthermore, to resolve control-related malfunctions, for example, the maintenance service no longer had to physically visit the site – while machine users benefited from increased system availability. 

Fraunhofer IPK contributed the technologies it had developed by the early 2000s to the Fraunhofer flagship project »e-Industrial Services,« which was launched in 2000 under the leadership of Fraunhofer IPA. In collaboration with the GMD Institute FOKUS (now Fraunhofer FOKUS), Ralf Berger developed a platform to support and implement digital service processes. The flagship project helped achieve greater reach and adoption for this topic.

The »e-Industrial Services« flagship project addressed topics that remain relevant to this day: The goal was to reduce the system costs of equipment over its entire life cycle. Equipment manufacturers were to increase the appeal of their products and tap into new business areas. Through service delivery, manufacturers were to obtain usage profiles of their equipment. This was intended to uncover optimization potential and, through »feedback to design,« incorporate these insights into the further development of products and services. During the project, Hohwieler’s team delved deeper into the topic of condition monitoring and expanded its developments in this area to include complementary services for a holistically digitally supported maintenance process. Many of the ideas could not yet be implemented as envisioned in the early 2000s. However, they formed the foundation for what would become widely adopted in the industry ten years later under the banner of »Industrie 4.0.«